What changes when we desire change

From a letter to a friend on therapy:

You know, the whole question of therapy is a enigma and quandary in many ways because certain insights only became ‘available’ to me years later, some  dynamics in therapy left me frightened or bewildered, other kinds of therapeutic relationship helped me break through a hiddenness and defendedness that I was not aware of in myself. There is an obliviousness many of us have that prevents us from seeing ourselves as others see us or from seeing the nature of what is wrong with us, what stops us from developing in certain ways or growing to maturity, what  is not healing because we can’t see or feel we are bleeding.

What helped me a great deal, although it was  extremely  hard at the time, was  participating in  facilitated therapy  groups for incest survivors and  seeing others use strategies and  mannerisms I myself relied on without being aware of them at all — and  seeing how others were left baffled or  withdrew. Slowly little by little I realised that although I understood  why  and how these  kinds of behaviours had become part of me — a constellation that involved the secret drinking and diary-keeping, inventions of ‘other’ lives for myself, a refusal to interact in many ways except in evasive or  cryptic ways, a closedness and  determination above all to defend and protect something within me, a private despair that anything would ever change, a refusal to relinquish old memories of  certain love affairs, the  creation of a reified and static  world within — the major issue facing me  was  how to  break out of this self-created  prison of what you might call a hermeneutically enclosed inner life. 

This was the  source of most of my adult suffering and prevented others from reaching me or being able to  enter my ‘personal space’, a withdrawnness and  sustained inner fantasy that made true intimacy impossible. I had to stop doing what I was doing in terms of  controlling distances and the flow of knowledge/truthfulness between myself and others, defending myself against any kind of  intrusiveness or closeness by others (I could not tell the difference).

And I began by stopping myself in therapy when I caught myself not telling the truth and starting over. I would correct myself again and again and  try to get closer to the unpalatable or unbearable truth as I saw it,  as others might have seen it, as the listening therapist saw it. After some years I found that my  understanding of  my own past and reality was now  more partial and fragmentary but more trustworthy and also shared. The  ‘lying’ and as-if behaviour that had helped  me  survive as a child had trapped me in a thin and idealised or  deprecated awareness, solipsistic and unconvincing to all but me. I had to  dismantle my self-understanding and  stop trying to pre-empt others’ versions from interfering with my ‘master-version’ of what was happening or what explained my behaviour. The habit of anticipating others, rehearsing for imagined conversations, seductions, confrontations, countering others with unanswerable  replies, controlling and editing the narrative — all this had to change. I had to let in witnesses and  share my story enough to accommodate what they thought, to allow for the possibility they knew more than me and could shed light on what I did not as yet know — without  yielding to the fantasy of another having all the answers and  being in charge, being able to rescue me. Or the terror of  finding myself again a helpless victimised  child at the mercy of someone who did not care about me, that  conviction that history would repeat itself over and over again without respite. I had to make space for  what had not yet happened and what would be  new and  different.

For a long time I did not associate these self-defeating guarded patterns with my progressive alcoholism. But when I sobered up and befriended others in recovery, I began to see many of  my own former  defended and closed-off ways of relating in others.  One person in particular was very similar to me and that may have been part of  why I was drawn to him as a mentor. And old  patterns in myself  re-emerged as they recognised familiar ground, very disconcerting. His understanding of sobriety was cut-and-dried and  not open to any questioning –  and his personal life in sobriety was  opaque, as mine had  been once  but was no longer. There was a generational influence at work, an older and more conservative gay man, reliant on a very South African macho pretext of self-sufficiency: he would never  involve anyone in  his decision-making or working through issues. He would only talk about  something that had pained him when it was long past and  for him, over. He was, like my earlier self,  predictable, inflexible and isolated, his thinking a  locked room, huis clos. He tended to assume that friends or  work colleagues or authority figures would behave in certain ways and  pre-empt that possibility as if it was a fixed outcome or certainty. In the sometimes antagonistic and sometimes more honest conversations we have had in the  intervening years, he  has admitted that he has begun to notice what he is doing and how it is unaccountable to him as a rational man — he has no idea why he would sabotage things in advance  rather than risk having to suffer rejection or  failure or  disaster at some future time. Nothing could be left open-ended or to chance. How well I myself have known that! Hard-wired for failure, that was the underlying conviction.  And he, this stubborn and dearly loved friend, may not change and that is not my concern. He too may have seen in me what he would rather not acknowledge in himself and  had a similar awakening.

That hatred of change and refusal to let in the unknown  is very familiar to me and  often comes up in dreams — that I leave the party or  sleeping house before something goes wrong (because it always will go wrong), that I tell a  lover to leave me before the lover can announce he or she is going away, that I ward off the unpredictable by assuming the worst  has   already happened, that while dreaming and  reliving the past I despairingly drink in order to  bring on what is bound to happen in any case, that  certain kinds of  behaviours or reactions in myself are  frozen, ritualised and feel necessary although there is in fact no necessity there. The refusal of  change, the refusal to let others in, is death in life, the dance macabre with inevitability in the rictus grin.

Always try to keep a patch of sky above your life

Well, yes, metaphor. The limitations of metaphor and wilful obscurity. You talk about making mud pies and  wallowing in ooze, and  on rereading it sounds as if  life should be a  mess. Which is not the case. There are things we  can  change, things we should  change, good and better choices. And then there is the stuff to be  accepted,  what is beyond our control, what lies beyond our individual  sphere of influence. Gifts that drop out of  nowhere.  The first line of a new story that comes to you on a midnight clear. The  ending of a story that reveals itself  just after you have  given up on the damn thing. Relationships: and the impossibilities of  love and  desire and  what  simply  doesn’t work,  what stays with us as regret or  longing. What to do about faith and  doubt, so inextricably linked? Mystery, sublime, ineffably mystery; and the  mundane,  and the question of who finished the  muesli and forgot to buy more.

 

And 100 years ago it was 1913, the year before the Great War. Here in South Africa, the housemate’s  grandfather had  bought  one of the first cars ( a black Ford of course)  in Kimberly, from  diamond diggings  profits. In the British  Protectorate of Rhodesia,  my  great-grandparents were prospecting for gold on the Lowveld  amongst the thorn trees of fever  country.  In New York, on Lexington Avenue, crowds were queuing to see America’s firstInternational Exhibition of Modern Art.

Diary entry 1913, written by  Franz Kafka: Don’t despair, not even over the fact that you don’t despair.

Rehearsals were underway in Paris for  a performance of Stravinsky’s Rites of Spring, starring the dancer Njinsky. Al Capone was expelled from school and  Louis Armstrong arrested for firing a gun in a public place. This was the year when both Rosa Parks and  Richard M Nixon were born. The  suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst was sentenced to three years in prison in London for her battle to  get  women the right to vote. Virginia Woolf was 31 years old and newly married. And the Parliament of South Africa passed a bill that barred any black person from owning land  anywhere in the country.

Nobody in the United States, Europe or Africa foresaw the terrible war that would come in the following year and change the world. The First World War would come too as an unwelcome surprise to many, although young men everywhere were eager for  war, the glory and  excitement of  battle.

A century later, war might sadden or horrify us, but no, not surprise us. The idea of a war to end all wars is too familiar now that  apocalyptic global catastrophe is part of the given, the  nightmare we live within.

 

Marcel Proust in Swann’s Way, written 1913: Always try to keep a patch of sky above your life.

 

How close they seem to us at times, those alive in 1913 — and how far away at other times. How sad that we can’t share their optimism going into the second decade of a new century filled with scientific discoveries and shockingly new art, hopes for  emancipation and lasting peace. We remember what came after.

 

Virginia Woolf: On or about December 1910, human character changed. I am not saying that one went out, as one might into a garden, and there saw that a rose had flowered, or that a hen had laid an egg. The change was not sudden and definite like that. But a change there was, nevertheless; and, since one must be arbitrary, let us date it about the year 1910.

 

Pioneer Salisbury