It always intrigues me how the number of comments left on a blog bears no relation to viewer statistics, That mystery has to do with Google search engines, RSS Feeds and/or the randomness of how regular readers pop in five times on one day and then not again for two days. Mulling over this, I’m happiest when I don’t have to think about being read except as the precursor to a conversation, an exchange of views. Often I refrain from saying anything controversial because it may not discourage regular readers but attracts too many viewers. Low profile works for me.
A paragraph gone here because the tow-headed bumbling electrician came around to check the intercom system for the security gate and whimsically switched off the mains without warning. I sat in the unlit kitchen and read a long LRB article about Kim Philby the spy living in Beirut in the late 1950s, propped up by the copious drinking he called his ‘snakebite’, that would eventually be part of his ruin in political exile.
Now I’m online again and unable to remember what I was writing about before the crash — except that we’re hovering around All Souls’ Day and the Day of the Dead, Halloween, moving towards Guy Fawkes. Spooky party games, fireworks, bonfires and ghost stories. When I think of the Mexican Day of the Dead, I think of the Tagetes marigolds displayed at this festival, so common out here, bright orange and with a pungent odour. And then I think of the symbolism woven around the Day of the Dead in Malcolm Lowry’s Under the Volcano, another of those fictional Day in the Life of a Drunkard novels, in this case a British consul drinking himself to death in 1930s Mexico. Lowry the novelist was doing the same thing (he referred to his life as an ‘alcoholocaust’) and the novel is a difficult, clotted, jejeune and dense novel. I liked it very much when I was in my 20s and taken up with the idea of creative artist as suffering alcoholic. These days I could do with more balance and perspective and less sturm und drang. The fraught self-mythologising of the heavy drinker has lost its appeal. Since I didn’t see the John Huston film of Under the Volcano, I have no idea how durable the work may be. Scenes to do with the Aztec Day of the Dead rituals struck me a gothic Elizabethan, akin to the theatrical but moving imagery of Ben Johnson or Webster’s Duchess of Malfi, perhaps less about Mexico than Lowry the fabulist’s love of Shakespearean drama.
But how hard it is to talk about alcoholism in another era, so much commonality but no self-help groups outside of church-based temperance movements and reliance on will power. For centuries, addiction was thought of as moral weakness, sign of a dissolute personality, or as a kind of demon-possession. This description of Malcolm Lowry in the 1940s after the success of Under the Volcano:
But for Lowry the trip was a horror. He had begun drinking again, and, when literary celebrities crowded to congratulate him at a party in his honor, he was too inebriated to respond. Dawn Powell, who was there, noted his distress in her diary. “He is the original Consul in the book,” she wrote, “a curious kind of person—handsome, vigorous, drunk—with an aura of genius about him and a personal electricity almost dangerous, sense of demon-possessed.”
There was little sense of sympathy, no idea that an alcoholic might be ill or unable to control his or her drinking, that they might need help rather than disapproval or confrontations. And by the 1940s, many active alcoholics were taking phenobarbital and other sleeping pills or tranquillizers mixed with bourbon or vodka. Most of the medical profession, along with their clients, had not yet heard of Alcoholics Anonymous or had no idea what might be different, what fellowship amongst recovering alcoholics might achieve. It would take two more decades before AA became a household word. The treatment of alcoholism and drug addiction was medieval, often relying on a crude aversion therapy:
Lowry, in turn, was persuaded by friends to see a doctor for his alcoholism. At a hospital in Wimbledon, in November, 1955, he met a psychiatrist named Michael Raymond, whom he grew to trust. Raymond gave Lowry a course of “aversion therapy,” which consisted of an injection of apomorphine followed by heavy drinking. The goal was for the patient to associate alcohol with the nausea brought on by the medicine.
Sedation followed by stimulants: barbiturates, sodium amytal, phenobarbital, Benzedrine, Allonal, Nembutal, Soneryl. Locked psychiatric wards. Sleep therapy with increased sedation. Will power. Aversion therapy. Religious conversion. More will power. Vigilance on the part of family members to prevent drinking. Locked asylum wards, padded cells, lobotomies. Repentance and more religion.A course of the new vitamin pills. Psychiatric treatment for depressive-paranoid types. Geographical changes, a sea cruise or a few weeks in the countryside. More sedatives.
It would be good to think all this has changed and that treatment now is more enlightened and effective. We’re not there yet. For many in the medical and psychiatric fields there is less faith in fellowship and sober support, than in the intensified pharmaceutical management of addictions and emotional illness. Quo vadis?

Because the pharmaceutical option is the one which makes the money?
Love,
T in J
Blessed Beltane!
I’m with you there, Terri, and blessed Beltane right back.
When you read that his therapy included being locked in a red-lit room for days on end, washing his hands with the the only liquid that he had on hand to drink, milk, it really cracks the heart in two. Plus, his wife after all his painful attempts at aversion, tried to get the doctor to lobotmize him! Thankfully the Dr. shrank from that suggestion immediately.
Thanks for popping in, Pete, yes I remember those harrowing details and so many alcoholics were not only lobotomised but sterilised from the 1930s to the 1950s.
Very pleased to have found your Twitter connection on Malcolm Lowry, I might do another post on him because he is as well known as Hemingway or Scott Fitzgerald but his life is as colourful and tragic
How sad that we in AA squandered our opportunity to make real inroads in the treatment of alcoholism. We let the treatment centers and pharmaceuticals take over, there are few who even know what AA is for or how it once worked. It is used as outpatient therapy in the follow-up from rehab.
And that paragraph perfectly illustrates why I no longer write on my “successful” blog – the one with all the readers and the nasty commenters. I am so much happier in my new incarnation, a simple blog for a simple drunk Catholic – without many answers, just questions. And even fewer readers! I check my search stats just to make sure I haven’t used any key words or phrases that are bringing random readers to my blog. When I find any, I remove them post haste!
Yes, yes, yes. We have some (unaffordable for locals) rehabs here with safaris and deep sea diving outings attached along with optional cosmetic surgery and the option of a private nutritionist and spa treatments every day. And topped with the promise of the newest latest pharmaceutical meds not yet approved in the US. AA is far too cheap and downmarket until the money runs out.
Many bloggers are now trying to go smaller and more intimate especially those of us not intending to ‘monetize’ our blogs or turn recovery into a career option. And those of us who don’t want pests stalking us or posting nasty comments. So far moderating works for me, but I do see my posts put up on rehab websites from time to time ( no permission asked) and feel irked. How much energy does one have to keep fighting for privacy?
I am horrified today to see a number of bloggers are endorsing a candidate for presidency. Recovery, what is that?
The only way I could get one of those rehabs to get my blog down was to write on my blog that I think it is nonsense to go to treatment – I think I mentioned them directly. Pooof! My blog was off their website!
By any chance, ts the black dog in your header, supposed to be a the dog that follows the Consul in the book? Because that is what I think of immediately when I see that.
Hi Pete, I didn’t think of that although I recall that dog — no, I put up that image a while back when I got a black Great Dane puppy, but also because the black dog signified trouble with depression, not severe but a part of my life. The isiZulu phrase for deep sadness is to have a black dog crossing the road nearby
I was reading an excerpt of Richard Burton’s diaries and was astounded by the casualness he mentions his drunkeness and the drinking/drug habits of Elizabeth Taylor. It’s such a different tone than I think he would write today if he were around. But maybe I’m wrong about that. It just seems like society’s relationship with alcoholism really has changed in recent years.
Pandora I was struck by the same thing when i was reading passages and reviews — although he knew liquor was trouble and later entries talk about his dread and illness, the downside of becoming more severely alcoholic and unable to stop. But that devil-may-care swashbuckling drinking was very much a Hollywood stance — that Rat Pack glamour, the film sets and affairs and all-night parties. He was haunted at times by the memory of fellow Welshman Dylan Thomas and his catastrophic death from drink, but warded off the serious darker sides of what was happening for as long as he could.